Skinner Wealth Strategies is a fee-based fiduciary financial advisor serving Wilton and the surrounding Fairfield County communities. We work with people who have spent a career building savings and now need a plan for turning it into income. Our focus is tax-efficient retirement planning for pre-retirees and retirees — coordinating your investments, your taxes, and your retirement income as one plan instead of three separate problems.
Wilton's wooded four-acre zoning and corporate campuses along Route 7 attract senior corporate professionals with complex compensation.
Much of our Fairfield County work happens across one cluster of towns — Wilton and neighbours like Westport, Redding and Bethel. The drive to Milford is short enough that in-person meetings stay easy to schedule around a workday.
Wilton is about 40 minutes from our Milford office. Many clients at this distance do the first meeting in person and the rest by video. We meet clients in person at either our Milford or West Hartford office, or virtually — whichever fits your schedule.
Who we work with in Wilton
We specialize in people over 50 who have more than $1 million in savings and who need help turning a life's work into a steady income stream for retirement, in a tax-sensitive way. When you have spent your career in saving mode, reorganizing those habits for a new phase of life is a genuine shift, and it is the shift we are built to help with.
The common thread is almost never a lack of savings. It is that the investments, the taxes, and the income have never been planned together — an investment manager here, a CPA there, and nobody owning the whole picture.
Where we start with Wilton clients
The same three steps for everyone, and the first two cost nothing:
What we do for Wilton retirees and pre-retirees
- Retirement Planning — retirement readiness analysis, scenario planning, and bringing a lifetime of separate pieces — an old 401(k), a pension, a brokerage account, an insurance policy — together into one coordinated plan.
- Retirement Income — an academically grounded approach built on income guardrails and investment buckets, taking every income source into account so the portfolio is not doing work that Social Security or a pension already does.
- Tax Planning — reviewing your annual return, planning Roth conversions each year, coordinating the timing of different income streams, and watching the thresholds that would otherwise spike your Medicare premiums later.
- Social Security Strategy — analyzing your filing age against your actual plan, understanding how your other income affects the benefit, and protecting a spouse's survivor benefit.
- Investment Management — keeping investment cost low, focusing on quality, and building the mix around the income you actually need rather than an abstract risk score — with tax efficiency decided at the holding level.
- Coordinated coverage review — we review existing policies as part of the plan and introduce you to qualified outside resources when something should be shopped. We do not sell insurance.
Building the portfolio around the income
A portfolio built to accumulate and a portfolio built to distribute are not the same portfolio, even when they hold similar things. While you are saving, a decline is an inconvenience and arguably an opportunity. Once you are drawing an income from it, the same decline is a forced sale. So the allocation stops being a question of abstract risk tolerance and becomes a question of funding dated, sequenced withdrawals: what has to be spendable in the next few years is held in short-duration assets, and only what is genuinely long-dated carries market risk. Mapping known income — Social Security, a pension — against required distributions and voluntary withdrawals also shows which years land in a lower bracket than the ones around them, and those are the years worth using for a conversion or a change in asset location.
Retirement income here starts with a chosen withdrawal rate and a dollar amount. Each year that amount adjusts for inflation, unless the portfolio has had a negative return over the prior twelve months. If strong performance pushes your withdrawal rate well below where it started, spending can increase; if a downturn pushes it well above, spending is trimmed. The point of setting the boundaries in advance is that you know before it happens what would cause your income to move and by how much — which is a very different experience from deciding what to do in the middle of a bad market.
Planning in Fairfield County
Fairfield County households often arrive at retirement with the most moving parts: a workplace plan, a taxable brokerage account built over decades, and a house that represents a large share of net worth. The planning question is rarely whether there is enough. It is how to draw an income from all of it without handing an avoidable share to taxes, and how to step down from a high-bracket working life into a retirement income plan deliberately rather than by default.
A question we get a lot here
When should I claim Social Security? We model your actual benefit at 62, at full retirement age, and at 70 against your real spending and other income, rather than applying a rule of thumb. For married couples the higher earner's decision permanently sets the survivor benefit, and that consequence usually outweighs the break-even math people focus on. If delaying is right, the next question is which assets fund the years in between.
Other things that come up often around Wilton
The first five years of withdrawals. Sequence-of-returns risk is the reason two retirees with the same average return can end up in very different places: it matters enormously whether the bad years land early, while you are drawing income. We hold near-term spending in short-duration assets specifically so a downturn is funded from the reserve rather than by selling depressed holdings at the worst possible moment.
How much of Social Security gets taxed. How much of your Social Security benefit becomes taxable depends on the rest of your income, which means the withdrawal decision and the claiming decision are really one decision. Planning them separately is how households end up paying tax on a benefit they could have partly sheltered by sequencing the year differently.
Medicare premium surcharges. Medicare Part B and Part D premiums are income-tested, and the test looks back two years. That means a decision at 63 — a large conversion, a property sale, a lumpy distribution — can raise your premiums at 65 without anyone having flagged it at the time. Watching those thresholds is routine work, and it is one of the most commonly missed costs of an otherwise sensible move.
The order you spend from. Most households arrive with three kinds of money — taxable, tax-deferred, and Roth — and no plan for which one funds which year. There is no universal answer, because the right order changes with your bracket, whether you are converting, whether you are on marketplace coverage before Medicare, and what your future required distributions look like. It is a decision that gets made annually, with the return in front of us.
Required minimum distributions. At some point the IRS stops letting a tax-deferred balance sit. Required minimum distributions arrive whether you need the income or not, and for households who saved diligently into a 401(k) for thirty years they can push you into a higher bracket in retirement than you were in while working. The planning happens in the years before they start, not in the year they do.