Skinner Wealth Strategies is a fee-based fiduciary financial advisor serving Kent and the surrounding Litchfield County communities. We work with people who have spent a career building savings and now need a plan for turning it into income. Our focus is tax-efficient retirement planning for pre-retirees and retirees — coordinating your investments, your taxes, and your retirement income as one plan instead of three separate problems.
Kent sits on the Housatonic along the Appalachian Trail, with Kent Falls and a gallery-lined Main Street.
We serve Kent as part of a broader Litchfield County practice that also covers Cornwall, Sharon and Sherman. Kent is one of the towns where the distance from West Hartford makes a virtual relationship the practical default rather than a compromise.
Kent sits roughly 60 minutes from our West Hartford office, so most clients out here work with us virtually — which, for this kind of planning, loses nothing. We meet clients in person at either our Milford or West Hartford office, or virtually — whichever fits your schedule.
Who we work with in Kent
We specialize in people over 50 who have more than $1 million in savings and who need help turning a life's work into a steady income stream for retirement, in a tax-sensitive way. When you have spent your career in saving mode, reorganizing those habits for a new phase of life is a genuine shift, and it is the shift we are built to help with.
The common thread is almost never a lack of savings. It is that the investments, the taxes, and the income have never been planned together — an investment manager here, a CPA there, and nobody owning the whole picture.
Where we start with Kent clients
The same three steps for everyone, and the first two cost nothing:
What we do for Kent retirees and pre-retirees
- Retirement Planning — retirement readiness analysis, scenario planning, and bringing a lifetime of separate pieces — an old 401(k), a pension, a brokerage account, an insurance policy — together into one coordinated plan.
- Retirement Income — an academically grounded approach built on income guardrails and investment buckets, taking every income source into account so the portfolio is not doing work that Social Security or a pension already does.
- Tax Planning — reviewing your annual return, planning Roth conversions each year, coordinating the timing of different income streams, and watching the thresholds that would otherwise spike your Medicare premiums later.
- Social Security Strategy — analyzing your filing age against your actual plan, understanding how your other income affects the benefit, and protecting a spouse's survivor benefit.
- Investment Management — keeping investment cost low, focusing on quality, and building the mix around the income you actually need rather than an abstract risk score — with tax efficiency decided at the holding level.
- Coordinated coverage review — we review existing policies as part of the plan and introduce you to qualified outside resources when something should be shopped. We do not sell insurance.
Building the portfolio around the income
A portfolio built to accumulate and a portfolio built to distribute are not the same portfolio, even when they hold similar things. While you are saving, a decline is an inconvenience and arguably an opportunity. Once you are drawing an income from it, the same decline is a forced sale. So the allocation stops being a question of abstract risk tolerance and becomes a question of funding dated, sequenced withdrawals: what has to be spendable in the next few years is held in short-duration assets, and only what is genuinely long-dated carries market risk. Mapping known income — Social Security, a pension — against required distributions and voluntary withdrawals also shows which years land in a lower bracket than the ones around them, and those are the years worth using for a conversion or a change in asset location.
Retirement income here starts with a chosen withdrawal rate and a dollar amount. Each year that amount adjusts for inflation, unless the portfolio has had a negative return over the prior twelve months. If strong performance pushes your withdrawal rate well below where it started, spending can increase; if a downturn pushes it well above, spending is trimmed. The point of setting the boundaries in advance is that you know before it happens what would cause your income to move and by how much — which is a very different experience from deciding what to do in the middle of a bad market.
Planning in Litchfield County
The Litchfield Hills and Northwest Corner are land-heavy. For many retired families here, real property — a long-held home, acreage, sometimes a second property — is a substantial share of net worth, which puts liquidity, cost basis, and Connecticut estate tax exposure near the front of the retirement conversation rather than the end of it. Distance from either office is real, so we do a lot of this work virtually.
A question we get a lot here
How much can I actually spend, and from which account? Instead of a fixed withdrawal percentage you hope holds, we set a starting rate with defined upper and lower guardrails that trigger an adjustment, and hold near-term spending in short-duration assets so a bad market is funded from the reserve rather than by selling depressed holdings. Which account funds which year is then a tax decision, and it changes as your bracket and your required distributions change.
Other things that come up often around Kent
The first five years of withdrawals. Sequence-of-returns risk is the reason two retirees with the same average return can end up in very different places: it matters enormously whether the bad years land early, while you are drawing income. We hold near-term spending in short-duration assets specifically so a downturn is funded from the reserve rather than by selling depressed holdings at the worst possible moment.
Spending it once you have permission to. A surprising amount of the work is not about whether the money lasts — it is about giving people a defensible reason to spend it. Decades of saving builds a habit that does not switch off, and plenty of retirees underspend their way through the healthiest years they will have. A plan with guardrails is as much about permission as it is about restraint.
Beneficiary designations. Beneficiary forms on retirement accounts and insurance policies pass outside your will, which means a form filled out before a marriage, a divorce, or a death quietly overrides an otherwise well-drafted estate plan. Reviewing them takes very little time and is one of the highest-value hours in the whole process.
The order you spend from. Most households arrive with three kinds of money — taxable, tax-deferred, and Roth — and no plan for which one funds which year. There is no universal answer, because the right order changes with your bracket, whether you are converting, whether you are on marketplace coverage before Medicare, and what your future required distributions look like. It is a decision that gets made annually, with the return in front of us.
Retiring before Medicare. For households leaving work before 65, health insurance is usually the deciding variable, and the rules moved this year. With the enhanced subsidies expired, the marketplace premium tax credit is once again an all-or-nothing threshold at 400% of the federal poverty level — approximately $62,600 single or $128,600 for a family of four. A dollar over and the credit is gone entirely, and the cap that used to limit how much excess advance credit you had to repay is gone too. Because the test is on realized income rather than net worth, the years between retiring and turning 65 are years where how you fund your spending sets what your coverage costs.